🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When including those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.