🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the baseball championship didn't occur during the nail-biting final game last Saturday, when her team pulled off one death-defying escape act after another before winning in overtime over the opposing team.

It happened a game earlier, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, executed a electrifying, game-winning play that at the same time challenged many harmful stereotypes touted about Latinos in the past decades.

The play in itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from left field to snag a ball he initially lost in the bright lights, then threw it to the infield to record another, game-winning out. Rojas, at second base, caught the ball just a split second before a runner barreled into him, sending him backwards.

This wasn't merely a great athletic moment, perhaps the decisive shift in momentum in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for much of the games like the underdog side. For Molina, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for the city after a period of immigration raids, troops monitoring the neighborhoods, and a constant drumbeat of negativity from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy put forth this counter-narrative," explained the professor. "Everyone witnessed Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of confidence. They are bombastic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"It was such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be demoralized these days."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team supporter these days – for her or for the legions of other fans who show up regularly to matches and fill up as many as 50% of the venue's 50,000 spots per game.

The Complicated Relationship with the Team

When intensified enforcement operations began in the city in June, and military units were deployed into the city to respond to resulting demonstrations, two of the city's sports teams promptly issued messages of support with immigrant families – but not the Dodgers.

The team president stated the organization want to stay away of political issues – a view influenced, perhaps, by the reality that a sizable minority of the fans, even Latinos, are followers of certain leaders. Under significant external demands, the team subsequently pledged $1m in support for individuals personally affected by the raids but issued no public criticism of the administration.

Official Visit and Historical Legacy

Three months earlier, the team did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to mark their previous championship win at the official residence – a move that local writers labeled as "disappointing … spineless … and contradictory", given the Dodgers' boast in having been the first major league team to end the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that legacy and the principles it embodies by officials and current and past athletes. A number of players such as the coach had expressed reluctance to travel to the White House during the initial period but then changed their minds or succumbed to demands from team management.

Corporate Control and Supporter Conflicts

A further complication for supporters is that the Dodgers are owned by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, as per sources and its own published financial documents, include a share in a detention company that runs detention centers. Guggenheim's executives has said many times that it wants to remain neutral of politics, but its detractors say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of acquiescence to current agendas.

These factors contribute to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – feelings that emerged even in the euphoria of this season's hard-won championship victory and the ensuing explosion of team support across the city.

"Can one to support the Dodgers?" local columnist Erick Galindo agonized at the start of the postseason in an elegant essay pondering on "Dodger blue in our veins, but uncertainty in our minds". He couldn't ultimately bring himself to view the championship, but he still cared strongly, to the extent that he believed his personal boycott must have brought the squad the fortune it required to win.

Separating the Players from the Owners

Many supporters who have similar reservations seem to have concluded that they can continue to back the players and its roster of international players, featuring the Asian superstar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's business leadership. Nowhere was this more evident than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in approval of the coach and his players but booed the team president and the top official of the investors.

"These men in suits don't get to claim our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We've been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Past Context and Community Impact

The issue, however, runs deeper than just the team's present owners. The agreement that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s required the city razing three low-income Latino neighborhoods on a elevated area overlooking the city center and then selling the land to the organization for a small part of its market value. A track on a 2005 record that documents the events has an low-income worker at the stadium revealing that the home he lost to removal is now a part of the field.

Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most influential Mexican American writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional relationship between the team and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an undue, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for decades.

"They've put one arm around Latino fans while profiting from them with the other for so much time because they have been able to get away with it," Arellano noted over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the team over its lack of response to the enforcement actions were upended by the awkward reality that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the height of the protests when the city center was subject to a nightly curfew.

International Stars and Community Connections

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {